中医、中西医结合病历书写基本规范（试行）
卫生部 国家中医药管理局
卫生部国家中医药管理局关于印发《中医、中西医结合病历书写基本规范（试行）》的通知
各省、自治区、直辖市卫生厅局、中医药管理局，新疆生产建设兵团卫生局：
根据《中华人民共和国执业医师法》、《医疗机构管理条例》、《医疗事故处理条例》和《中华人民共和国护士管理办法》，卫生部和国家中医药管理局制定了《中医、中西医结合病历书写基本规范（试行）》，现印发给你们，请遵照执行。
二○○二年八月二十三日
中医、中西医结合病历书写基本规范（试行）
第一章 基本要求
第一条 病历是指医务人员在医疗活动过程中形成的文字、符号、图表、影像、切片等资料的总和，包括门（急）诊病历和住院病历。
第二条 病历书写是指医务人员通过问诊、查体、辅助检查、诊断、治疗、护理等医疗活动获得有关资料，并进行归纳、分析、整理形成医疗活动记录的行为。
第三条 病历书写应当客观、真实、准确、及时、完整。
第四条 住院病历书写应当使用蓝黑墨水、碳素墨水，门（急）诊病历和需复写的资料可以使用蓝或黑色油水的圆珠笔。
第五条 病历书写应当使用中文和医学术语。通用的外文缩写和无正式中文译名的症状、体征、疾病名称等可以使用外文。中医术语的使用依照有关标准、规范执行。
第六条 病历书写应当文字工整，字迹清晰，表述准确，语句通顺，标点正确。书写过程中出现错字时，应当用双线划在错字上，不得采用刮、粘、涂等方法掩盖或去除原来的字迹。
第七条 病历应当按照规定的内容书写，并由相应医务人员签名。
实习医务人员、试用期医务人员书写的病历，应当经过在本医疗机构合法执业的医务人员审阅、修改并签名。
进修医务人员应当由接收进修的医疗机构根据其胜任本专业工作的实际情况认定后书写病历。
第八条 上级医务人员有审查修改下级医务人员书写的病历的责任。修改时，应当注明修改日期，修改人员签名，并保持原记录清楚、可辨。
第九条 因抢救急危患者，未能及时书写病历的，有关医务人员应当在抢救结束后6小时内据实补记，并加以注明。
第十条 病历书写中涉及的诊断，包括中医诊断和西医诊断,其中中医诊断包括疾病诊断与证候诊断。中医治疗应当遵循辨证论治的原则。
第十一条 对按照有关规定需取得患者书面同意方可进行的医疗活动（如特殊检查、特殊治疗、手术、实验性临床医疗等），应当由患者本人签署同意书。患者不具备完全民事行为能力时，应当由其法定代理人签字；患者因病无法签字时，应当由其近亲属签字，没有近亲属的，由其关系人签字；为抢救患者，在法定代理人或近亲属、关系人无法及时签字的情况下，可由医疗机构负责人或者被授权的负责人签字。
因实施保护性医疗措施不宜向患者说明情况的，应当将有关情况通知患者近亲属，由患者近亲属签署同意书，并及时记录。患者无近亲属的或者患者近亲属无法签署同意书的，由患者的法定代理人或者关系人签署同意书。
第二章 门（急）诊病历书写要求及内容
第十二条 门（急）诊病历内容包括门诊病历首页（门诊手册封面）、病历记录、化验单（检验报告）、医学影像检查资料等。
第十三条 门（急）诊病历首页内容应当包括患者姓名、性别、出生年月、民族、婚姻状况、职业、工作单位、住址、药物过敏史等项目。
门诊手册封面内容应当包括患者姓名、性别、年龄、工作单位或住址、药物过敏史等项目。
第十四条 门（急）诊病历记录分为初诊病历记录和复诊病历记录。
初诊病历记录书写内容应当包括就诊时间、科别、主诉、现病史、既往史，阳性体征、必要的阴性体征和辅助检查结果、诊断及治疗意见和医师签名等。
复诊病历记录书写内容应当包括就诊时间、科别、主诉、病史、必要的体格检查和辅助检查结果、诊断、治疗处理意见和医师签名等。
急诊病历书写就诊时间应当具体到分钟。
第十五条 门（急）诊病历记录应当由接诊医师在患者就诊时及时完成。
第十六条 抢救危重患者时，应当书写抢救记录。对收入急诊观察室的患者，应当书写留观期间的观察记录。
第三章 住院病历书写要求及内容
第十七条 住院病历内容包括住院病案首页、住院志、体温单、医嘱单、化验单（检验报告）、医学影像检查资料、特殊检查（治疗）同意书、手术同意书、麻醉记录单、手术及手术护理记录单、病理资料、护理记录、出院记录（或死亡记录）、病程记录（含抢救记录）、疑难病例讨论记录、会诊意见、上级医师查房记录、死亡病例讨论记录等。
第十八条 住院志是指患者入院后，由经治医师通过问诊、查体、辅助检查获得有关资料，并对这些资料归纳分析书写而成的记录。住院志的书写形式分为入院记录、再次或多次入院记录、24小时内入出院记录、24小时内入院死亡记录。
入院记录、再次或多次入院记录应当于患者入院后24小时内完成；24小时内入出院记录应当于患者出院后24小时内完成，24小时内入院死亡记录应当于患者死亡后24小时内完成。
第十九条 入院记录的要求及内容：
（一）患者一般情况内容包括姓名、性别、年龄、民族、婚姻状况、出生地、职业、入院日期、记录日期、发病节气、病史陈述者。
（二）主诉是指促使患者就诊的主要症状（或体征）及持续时间。
（三）现病史是指患者本次疾病的发生、演变、诊疗等方面的详细情况，应当按时间顺序书写，并结合中医问诊要求，记录目前情况。内容包括发病情况、主要症状特点及其发展变化情况、伴随症状、发病后诊疗经过及结果、睡眠和饮食等一般情况的变化，以及与鉴别诊断有关的阳性或阴性资料等。
与本次疾病虽无紧密关系、但仍需治疗的其他疾病情况，可在现病史后另起一段予以记录。
（四）既往史是指患者过去的健康和疾病情况。内容包括既往一般健康状况、疾病史、传染病史、预防接种史、手术外伤史、输血史、药物过敏史等。
（五）个人史，婚育史、女性患者的月经史，家族史。
（六）体格检查应当按照系统循序进行书写。内容包括体温、脉搏、呼吸、血压，一般情况（包括中医四诊的神色、形态、语声、气息、舌象、脉象等），皮肤、粘膜，全身浅表淋巴结，头部及其器官，颈部，胸部（胸廓、肺部、心脏、血管），腹部（肝、脾等），直肠肛门，外生殖器，脊柱，四肢，神经系统等。
（七）专科情况应当根据专科需要记录专科特殊情况。
（八）辅助检查是指入院前所作的与本次疾病相关的主要检查及其结果。应当写明检查日期，如系在其他医疗机构所作检查，应当写明该机构名称。
（九）初步诊断是指经治医师根据患者入院时情况，综合分析所作出的诊断。如初步诊断为多项时，应当主次分明。
（十）书写入院记录的医师签名。
第二十条 再次或多次入院记录是指患者因同一种疾病再次或多次住入同一医疗机构时书写的记录。要求及内容基本同入院记录，其特点有：主诉是记录患者本次入院的主要症状（或体征）及持续时间；现病史中要求首先对本次住院前历次有关住院诊疗经过进行小结，然后再书写本次入院的现病史。
第二十一条 患者入院不足24小时出院的，可以书写24小时内入出院记录。内容包括患者姓名、性别、年龄、职业、入院时间、出院时间、主诉、入院情况、入院诊断、诊疗经过、出院情况、出院诊断、出院医嘱、医师签名等。
第二十二条 患者入院不足24小时死亡的，可以书写24小时内入院死亡记录。内容包括患者姓名、性别、年龄、职业、入院时间、死亡时间、主诉、入院情况、入院诊断、诊疗经过（抢救经过）、死亡原因、死亡诊断、医师签名等。
第二十三条 病程记录是指继住院志之后，对患者病情和诊疗过程所进行的连续性记录。内容包括患者的病情变化及证候变化情况、重要的辅助检查结果及临床意义、上级医师查房意见、会诊意见、医师分析讨论意见、所采取的诊疗措施及效果、医嘱更改及理由、向患者及其近亲属告知的重要事项等。
第二十四条 病程记录的要求及内容：
（一）首次病程记录是指患者入院后由经治医师或值班医师书写的第一次病程记录，应当在患者入院8小时内完成。首次病程记录的内容包括病例特点、诊断依据及鉴别诊断、诊疗计划等。诊断依据包括中医辨病辨证依据与西医诊断依据，鉴别诊断包括中医鉴别诊断与西医鉴别诊断。
（二）日常病程记录是指对患者住院期间诊疗过程的经常性、连续性记录。由医师书写，也可以由实习医务人员或试用期医务人员书写。书写日常病程记录时，首先标明记录日期，另起一行记录具体内容。对病危患者应当根据病情变化随时书写病程记录，每天至少1次，记录时间应当具体到分钟。对病重患者，至少2天记录一次病程记录。对病情稳定的患者，至少3天记录一次病程记录。对病情稳定的慢性病患者，至少5天记录一次病程记录。
（三）上级医师查房记录是指上级医师查房时对患者病情、证候、诊断、鉴别诊断、当前治疗措施疗效的分析及下一步诊疗意见等的记录。
主治医师首次查房记录应当于患者入院48小时内完成。内容包括查房医师的姓名、专业技术职务、补充的病史和体征、诊断依据与鉴别诊断的分析及诊疗计划等。主治医师日常查房记录间隔时间视病情和诊疗情况确定，内容包括查房医师的姓名、专业技术职务、对病情的分析和诊疗意见等。科主任或具有副主任医师以上专业技术职务任职资格医师查房的记录，内容包括查房医师的姓名、专业技术职务、对病情的分析和诊疗意见等。
（四）疑难病例讨论记录是指由科主任或具有副主任医师以上专业技术职务任职资格的医师主持、召集有关医务人员对确诊困难或疗效不确切病例讨论的记录。内容包括讨论日期、主持人及参加人员姓名、专业技术职务、讨论意见等。
（五）交（接）班记录是指患者经治医师发生变更之际，交班医师和接班医师分别对患者病情及诊疗情况进行简要总结的记录。交班记录应当在交班前由交班医师书写完成；接班记录应当由接班医师于接班后24小时内完成。交（接）班记录的内容包括入院日期、交班或接班日期、患者姓名、性别、年龄、主诉、入院情况、入院诊断、诊疗经过、目前情况、目前诊断、交班注意事项或接班诊疗计划、医师签名等。
（六）转科记录是指患者住院期间需要转科时，经转入科室医师会诊并同意接收后，由转出科室和转入科室医师分别书写的记录。包括转出记录和转入记录。转出记录由转出科室医师在患者转出科室前书写完成（紧急情况除外）；转入记录由转入科室医师于患者转入后24小时内完成。转科记录内容包括入院日期、转出或转入日期，患者姓名、性别、年龄、主诉、入院情况、入院诊断、诊疗经过、目前情况、目前诊断、转科目的及注意事项或转入诊疗计划、医师签名等。
（七）阶段小结是指患者住院时间较长，由经治医师每月所作病情及诊疗情况的总结。阶段小结的内容包括入院日期、小结日期，患者姓名、性别、年龄、主诉、入院情况、入院诊断、诊疗经过、目前情况、目前诊断、诊疗计划、医师签名等。
交（接）班记录、转科记录可代替阶段小结。
（八）抢救记录是指患者病情危重，采取抢救措施时作的记录。内容包括病情变化情况、抢救时间及措施、参加抢救的医务人员姓名及专业技术职务等。记录抢救时间应当具体到分钟。
（九）会诊记录（含会诊意见）是指患者在住院期间需要其他科室或者其他医疗机构协助诊疗时，分别由申请医师和会诊医师书写的记录。内容包括申请会诊记录和会诊意见记录。申请会诊记录应当简要载明患者病情及诊疗情况、申请会诊的理由和目的，申请会诊医师签名等。会诊意见记录应当有会诊意见、会诊医师所在的科别或者医疗机构名称、会诊时间及会诊医师签名等。
（十）术前小结是指在患者手术前，由经治医师对患者病情所作的总结。内容包括简要病情、术前诊断、手术指征、拟施手术名称和方式、拟施麻醉方式、注意事项等。
（十一）术前讨论记录是指因患者病情较重或手术难度较大，手术前在上级医师主持下，对拟实施手术方式和术中可能出现的问题及应对措施等进行讨论的记录。内容包括术前准备情况、手术指征、手术方案、可能出现的意外及防范措施、参加讨论者的姓名、专业技术职务、讨论日期、记录者的签名等。
（十二）麻醉记录是指麻醉医师在麻醉实施中书写的麻醉经过及处理措施的记录。麻醉记录应当另页书写，内容包括患者一般情况、麻醉前用药、术前诊断、术中诊断、麻醉方式、麻醉期间用药及处理、手术起止时间、麻醉医师签名等。
（十三）手术记录是指手术者书写的反映手术一般情况、手术经过、术中发现及处理等情况的特殊记录，应当在术后24小时内完成。特殊情况下由第一助手书写时，应有手术者签名。手术记录应当另页书写，内容包括一般项目（患者姓名、性别、科别、病房、床位号、住院病历号或病案号）、手术日期、术前诊断、术中诊断、手术名称、手术者及助手姓名、麻醉方法、手术经过、术中出现的情况及处理等。
（十四）手术护理记录是指巡回护士对手术患者术中护理情况及所用器械、敷料的记录，应当在手术结束后即时完成。手术护理记录应当另页书写，内容包括患者姓名、住院病历号（或病案号）、手术日期、手术名称、术中护理情况、所用各种器械和敷料数量的清点核对、巡回护士和手术器械护士签名等。
（十五）术后首次病程记录是指参加手术的医师在患者术后即时完成的病程记录。内容包括手术时间、术中诊断、麻醉方式、手术方式、手术简要经过、术后处理措施、术后应当特别注意观察的事项等。
第二十五条 手术同意书是指手术前，经治医师向患者告知拟施手术的相关情况，并由患者签署同意手术的医学文书。内容包括术前诊断、手术名称、术中或术后可能出现的并发症、手术风险、患者签名、医师签名等。
第二十六条 特殊检查、特殊治疗同意书是指在实施特殊检查、特殊治疗前，经治医师向患者告知特殊检查、特殊治疗的相关情况，并由患者签署同意检查、治疗的医学文书。内容包括特殊检查、特殊治疗项目名称、目的、可能出现的并发症及风险、患者签名、医师签名等。
第二十七条 出院记录是指经治医师对患者此次住院期间诊疗情况的总结，应当在患者出院后24小时内完成。内容主要包括入院日期、出院日期、入院情况、入院诊断、诊疗经过、出院诊断、出院情况、出院医嘱、医师签名等。
第二十八条 死亡记录是指经治医师对死亡患者住院期间诊疗和抢救经过的记录，应当在患者死亡后24小时内完成。内容包括入院日期、死亡时间、入院情况、入院诊断、诊疗经过（重点记录病情演变、抢救经过）、死亡原因、死亡诊断等。记录死亡时间应当具体到分钟。
第二十九条 死亡病例讨论记录是指在患者死亡一周内，由科主任或具有副主任医师以上专业技术职务任职资格的医师主持，对死亡病例进行讨论、分析的记录。内容包括讨论日期、主持人及参加人员姓名、专业技术职务、讨论意见等。
第三十条 医嘱是指医师在医疗活动中下达的医学指令。
医嘱内容及起始、停止时间应当由医师书写。
医嘱内容应当准确、清楚，每项医嘱应当只包含一个内容，并注明下达时间，应当具体到分钟。
医嘱不得涂改。需要取消时，应当使用红色墨水标注"取消"字样并签名。
一般情况下，医师不得下达口头医嘱。因抢救急危患者需要下达口头医嘱时，护士应当复诵一遍。抢救结束后，医师应当即刻据实补记医嘱。
医嘱单分为长期医嘱单和临时医嘱单。
长期医嘱单内容包括患者姓名、科别、住院病历号（或病案号）、页码、起始日期和时间、长期医嘱内容、停止日期和时间、医师签名、执行时间、执行护士签名。临时医嘱单内容包括医嘱时间、临时医嘱内容、医师签名、执行时间、执行护士签名等。
第三十一条 辅助检查报告单是指患者住院期间所做各项检验、检查结果的记录。内容包括患者姓名、性别、年龄、住院病历号（或病案号）、检查项目、检查结果、报告日期、报告人员签名或者印章等。
第三十二条 体温单为表格式，以护士填写为主。内容包括患者姓名、科室、床号、入院日期、住院病历号（或病案号）、日期、手术后天数、体温、脉博、呼吸、血压、大便次数、出入液量、体重、住院周数等。
第三十三条 护理记录分为一般患者护理记录和危重患者护理记录。
一般患者护理记录是指护士根据医嘱和病情对一般患者住院期间护理过程的客观记录。内容包括患者姓名、科别、住院病历号（或病案号）、床位号、页码、记录日期和时间、病情观察情况、护理措施和效果、护士签名等。
危重患者护理记录是指护士根据医嘱和病情对危重患者住院期间护理过程的客观记录。危重患者护理记录应当根据相应专科的护理特点书写。内容包括患者姓名、科别、住院病历号（或病案号）、床位号、页码、记录日期和时间、出入液量、体温、脉搏、呼吸、血压等病情观察、护理措施和效果、护士签名等。记录时间应当具体到分钟。
采取中医护理措施应当体现辨证施护。
第四章 其他
第三十四条 住院病案首页应当按照《国家中医药管理局关于修订印发中医住院病案首页的通知》（国中医药发〔2001〕6号）的规定书写。
第三十五条 特殊检查、特殊治疗的含义依照1994年8月29日卫生部令第35号《医疗机构管理条例实施细则》第88条。
第三十六条 民族医病历书写基本规范由有关省、自治区、直辖市中医药行政管理部门依据本规范另行制定。
第三十七条 本规范自2002年9月1日起施行。国家中医药管理局2000年7月发布的《中医病案规范（试行）》同时废止。
以民为本 为民谋利 积极务实推进两岸“三通”
国务院台湾事务办公室
以民为本 为民谋利 积极务实推进两岸“三通”
国务院台湾事务办公室
（二OO三年 十二月十七 日）
前 言
1949年以后的三十多年间，由于台湾海峡两岸处于军事对峙状态，两岸人员往来和通邮、通航、通商全部中断，两岸同胞处于隔绝状态。1979年元旦，全国人大常委会发表《告台湾同胞书》，为有利于两岸同胞互通讯息，探亲访友，旅游参观，发展经济、文化等各方面的关系，首倡两岸"双方尽快实现通邮，通航"，"发展贸易，互通有无，进行经济交流"。从此，祖国大陆方面为实现两岸通邮、通航、通商（"三通"）进行了不懈努力。1987年11月，台湾当局决定开放台湾同胞赴大陆探亲，受到大陆方面的欢迎，长达三十八年之久的两岸同胞隔绝状态终于被打破。此后，两岸人员往来和经济、文化等领域交流的开展，推动了"三通"进程。十几年来，两岸同胞往来与交流已经大大发展了。但令人遗憾的是，由于台湾当局的限制和阻挠，两岸"三通"仍然处于间接、单向、局部的状态。早日实现直接、双向、全面"三通"，符合两岸同胞的切身利益和根本利益。我们希望两岸同胞共同努力，积极务实推动两岸"三通"，造福子孙。
一、两岸"三通"现状及面临的问题
（一）两岸"三通"进展情况。
在两岸同胞的强烈要求及两岸业者的协商努力下，20多年来，两岸"三通"从无到有，取得不同程度的进展。
1、两岸通邮进展情况
在邮政业务方面。1979年，大陆方面正式开办对台平信和挂号信函业务。1989年，两岸邮件总包互相直封并经香港转运。1993年4月，海峡两岸关系协会与台湾海峡交流基金会签署《两岸挂号函件查询、补偿事宜协议》，两岸邮政部门正式互办挂号函件业务。
在电信业务方面。1979年，大陆方面开办对台电报、电话业务。1989年，台湾方面通过第三地开通对大陆电报和电话业务。1996年，中国电信与台湾中华电信建立两岸直接电信业务关系。通过1999年、2000年先后建成的中美、亚欧、亚太海底光缆，建立了两岸直达通信路由。两岸电信部门已开办电话、数据通信、移动电话漫游、电视电话等业务。两岸电信业务量迅速增加，分别占大陆、台湾境外业务量的第二位、第一位。
2、两岸通航进展情况
在海上通航方面。1979年8月，大陆方面倡议就两岸海上运输问题同台湾航运界进行协商，并宣布各对外开放港口均可对台湾船舶开放。为保障两岸航行安全，大陆一侧的灯桩解除了对台方的遮蔽；海岸电台对台湾船舶全面开放，为台湾船舶提供通讯导航服务；两岸救助部门建立搜救热线。1996年8月颁布的《台湾海峡两岸间航运管理办法》等法规，规范了两岸海上直航的基本事项。迄今，大陆方面共批准台湾航运公司在大陆沿海主要港口设立7家营业性机构和37家航运代表处。
1997年4月，福州、厦门和高雄间的海上试点直航开始运行，两岸资本的船公司使用方便旗船（或称权宜轮）经高雄港转运两岸外贸中转货物。1998年3月，两岸定期集装箱班轮航线开通，运输两岸货物的船舶经第三地换单不换船航行两岸港口。
2001年初，考虑到金门、马祖民众的需求，大陆方面为金、马与福建沿海地区的海上通航尽力提供协助。双方使用两岸资本并在两岸注册的船舶，采用只挂公司旗的方式，开通了两地海上客运、货运航线。
在空中通航方面。1981年10月，大陆民航主管部门表示随时准备与台湾有关方面进行两岸空中通航的谈判。1990年3月，颁布《中国大陆与台湾间民用航空运输不定期飞行的申请和批准程序的暂行规定》。1989年至1996年，两岸民航业界互为客货销售代理和开办"一票到底"、"行李直挂"等业务，签署了多项协议，开展了涉及票务、商务、机务、航务、服务等方面的合作。1995年12月、1996年8月，澳门航空、港龙航空分别开辟了澳台、港台航线，实现了大陆经澳门、香港至台湾"一机到底"的间接通航。1997年迄今，大陆有关方面批准4家台湾航空公司在北京设立代表处。
2003年春节期间，为便利台商返乡过年，大陆方面采取灵活务实的办法，特事特办，批准台湾6家航空公司共16架次包机，从台北、高雄经停港澳至上海往返接送台商。这是50多年来台湾航空公司的飞机首次循正常途径停降大陆机场。
3、两岸通商（贸易、投资、金融）进展情况
在两岸贸易方面。从1979年开始，大陆方面即对台湾产品开放市场，并给予免税、减税等优惠待遇。2000年12月，外经贸部颁布了《对台湾地区贸易管理办法》。两岸贸易金额1978年为0.46亿美元，2002年增至446.6亿美元，增长了近970倍。截至2003年9月底，两岸贸易总额累计3091.8亿美元，其中大陆对台出口488.9亿美元，自台进口2602.9亿美元，累计逆差达2114亿美元。自1991年始，大陆已成为台湾最大的顺差来源。根据2002年统计，大陆已成为台湾第一大出口市场，台湾是大陆第二大进口市场。
在投资方面。1988年7月，国务院颁布了《关于鼓励台湾同胞投资的规定》。1992年，台湾当局允许台湾同胞经第三地对大陆间接投资和进行技术合作。1994年3月，全国人大常委会通过了《台湾同胞投资保护法》， 1999年12月，国务院制定了《台湾同胞投资保护法实施细则》，各地方人大和政府也结合本地实际，制定了相应的地方性法规和行政规章，形成和完善了保护台胞合法权益的法律法规体系。大陆各有关部门和各地方不断改善投资环境，努力为台胞提供优质服务，促进了台胞投资。截至2003年9月底，大陆方面累计批准台资项目59458个，合同台资679.8亿美元，实际使用台资357.1亿美元。根据台湾有关方面统计，自1993年始，大陆成为台商对外投资的首选地区。
在两岸金融交流与合作方面。2002年，大陆的商业银行与台湾地区银行的海外业务分行（OBU）正式开办通汇及信用证相关业务；2003年，大陆的商业银行与台湾地区的外汇指定银行(DBU)也开通了通汇及信用证相关业务。截止2003年10月，大陆方面已批准设立2家台资银行、7家台湾地区银行的代表处、9家台湾地区保险公司和1家台湾地区保险经纪人公司的12个代表处、12家台湾地区证券公司的17个代表处。
在推进两岸"三通"的进程中，两岸民间行业组织不断就"三通"的技术性、业务性问题进行深入探讨，达成诸多共识。两岸通信业务商谈的成功实践，两岸海上试点直航的顺利运营，福建沿海与金门、马祖海上双向直航中的一些敏感问题的妥善解决，2003年春节台商包机的实施，说明两岸业者完全可以找到双方接受的办法。事实上，两岸直接"三通"的技术性、业务性问题均已解决。
（二）两岸"三通"仍处于间接、单向、局部的状态，限制了两岸同胞的交流交往和两岸经贸合作的发展。
在通邮方面。两岸邮件总包仍需经香港、澳门转运，而且业务种类少，邮政包裹、小包、汇兑、速递等项业务均不能开办。
在通航方面。两岸船舶、飞机不能直接往来；两岸人员旅行仍需经香港、澳门等地中转；试点直航不能运输两岸贸易货物，两岸贸易货物仍需经日本、香港等第三地中转，造成了"船通货不通，货通船不通"的怪象。
在通商方面。大陆市场向台湾企业和商品全面开放，而大陆产品输台受到诸多歧视性的限制，许多大陆较具优势及台湾同胞迫切需要的商品不能进入台湾；大陆的企业不能向台湾投资，必要的商务机构也不能在台设立；大陆企业难以在台湾举办或参加经贸展览会、洽谈会；大陆经贸人士赴台考察、访问也受到诸多限制。
（三）两岸直接、双向、全面"三通"未能实现的主要障碍在于台湾当局的阻挠。
长期以来，台湾当局无视两岸同胞的迫切愿望，也不顾台湾经济发展的需要，给两岸"三通"设置了重重障碍。从李登辉到台湾当局现任领导人，都一直以所谓"对等、安全、尊严"为借口，拖延和阻止"三通"。台湾当局在相关规定中，刻意对"三通"设置严格的限制条款，附加了种种政治条件，极力阻挠两岸"三通"谈判。台湾当局现任领导人一方面拒不接受一个中国原则，不承认"九二共识"，致使两岸对话与谈判无法恢复；另一方面又不接受简便易行的民间行业组织协商"三通"问题的办法，致使"三通"商谈迟迟不能启动。事实充分表明，台湾当局现任领导人虽然表示过"三通"不应成为一个问题，"是必走的路"，但是实质上毫无诚意，根本不愿意两岸交流和两岸关系得到正常发展。他不但自食其言、出尔反尔，百般拖延开放"三通"，而且极力使"三通"问题政治化、复杂化，甚至将两岸"三通"纳入其"一边一国"分裂主张的框架中去。台湾当局现任领导人破坏两岸关系发展、蓄意分裂祖国的立场和政策，是两岸直接、双向、全面"三通"迄今无法实现的根本原因。
二、实现 "三通"符合两岸同胞切身利益，是两岸实现互利双赢的根本途径。
（一）直接、双向、全面"三通"是两岸人员往来和经贸交流的客观需要。
1988年至2002年，共有超过2700多万人次的台湾同胞来大陆探亲访友、旅游考察、投资经营和从事两岸交流活动，大陆人员往来台湾也有70多万人次。2002年，两岸之间的客运量已近400万人次，贸易额超过400亿美元，货运量达数千万吨。不能直接、双向、全面"三通"，不仅给两岸同胞尤其是台湾同胞增加了经济负担，更耗费了大量时间和精力。
在客运方面。以乘飞机从台北途经香港到上海为例，台港往返机票每人次的费用为380美元，以2700万人次计，仅此一项，台湾同胞已损失约100多亿元美元；台北直飞上海仅需约1小时15分钟，中转香港后延长为约4小时，加上候机，时间浪费更甚。
在货运方面。以从上海港到高雄港海上货运为例，两地直线距离600海里，绕经日本石垣岛则增加232海里航程，既增加了运输成本，也延长了运输时间。空运直航后，不仅大量节省运输成本及时间，而且因物流配送效率的提升，将促进两岸贸易增长。
（二）直接、双向、全面"三通"有利于两岸经济共同发展。
两岸经济处于不同的发展阶段，经济合作存在着充分的互补条件和巨大的发展空间。十几年来两岸经济交往的历史，是两岸经济发展双赢的历史。
两岸经济交流与合作对台湾经济增长的贡献显而易见。台湾中华经济研究院研究显示，台湾对大陆的出口额每增加1美元，可直接、间接诱发台湾相关产业增加产值2美元。台湾从两岸贸易中获得的高额顺差，对保持台湾外汇储备增长贡献巨大。两岸贸易不断发展，成为支撑台湾经济成长的重要支柱。
直接、双向、全面"三通"的实现有利于台湾经济的持续发展。1988年以来，台湾劳动力密集型产业向大陆的转移，使其重获生机。近年台湾经济低迷、产业结构提升停滞、投资消费不振、失业率和民众痛苦指数上升，"三通"不通是重要因素之一。台湾工商界普遍认为，"三通"一旦实现，台湾的区位优势可以得到充分发挥，投资环境将得到显著改善；台湾企业还可以更充分地利用大陆的资源和市场发展壮大，使台湾经济得到更大的发展；大陆企业也可以向台湾投资，必将为台湾经济注入新的活力，创造新的商机。
两岸经济交流与合作也为大陆经济发展做出了重要贡献。台商投资为大陆带来了资金、技术、企业管理及营销经验，扩大了对外贸易，提供了税收。在大陆实现全面建设小康社会宏伟目标的进程中，台湾同胞将有更多的参与机会，在促进大陆经济发展的同时，自身也将获得更大的发展。
（三）直接、双向、全面"三通"有利于两岸同胞共同因应世界经济全球化和区域化发展的趋势，加强合作，抓住机遇，应对挑战。
当今世界，科技进步迅猛发展，经济全球化和区域化势头强劲，综合实力竞争日趋激烈。两岸同胞既面临机遇，也面临挑战。早日实现直接、双向、全面"三通"，将使两岸获得更充分的信息、更便捷的运输、更畅通的资金流动和更有效率的资源配置，各得其所，发挥潜能，大大提高两岸经济的竞争力，加快共同发展，促进中华民族经济的全面振兴。
十几年来，两岸关系历经坎坷、曲折，但是，人员往来和经济、文化等领域的交流始终保持发展的势头，推动两岸"三通"进程展现新的前景。这充分说明：两岸同胞同宗同文，有着不能割舍的民族感情，有着愈益深厚的共同利益。两岸"三通"，有利于两岸经济共同繁荣，符合两岸同胞的根本利益和切身利益。两岸人员往来和经济、文化等领域的交流创造的丰硕成果，使得实现直接、双向、全面"三通"具有厚实的基础和内在的动力。台湾各界要求尽快实现"三通"的呼声持续高涨。两岸同胞在推动"三通"中，有过多次成功的实践，积累了丰富的经验。大陆方面已经为"三通"做好了各方面的准备。总之，"三通"已是大势所趋，人心所向。
三、大陆方面关于两岸"三通"的基本立场和政策主张
大陆和台湾同属一个中国。中国是两岸同胞的中国，是两岸同胞的共同家园。任何制造所谓"台湾独立"、"两个中国"、"一中一台"的分裂图谋和行为，均为两岸同胞所反对。两岸"三通"，是两岸同胞共同利益之所在，也是两岸交往不断扩大的必然要求，不应受到任何人为因素和政治因素的阻碍。我们希望尽快实现两岸全面"三通"，以开创两岸经济合作新局面，造福于两岸同胞。基于上述基本立场，我们重申关于两岸"三通"的政策与主张。
（一）以民为本、为民谋利，是解决"三通"问题的立足点和出发点。在推进"三通"的过程中，只要真正对两岸同胞有利、对两岸人员往来有利、对两岸经贸关系发展有利，尤其对台湾同胞有利、对台湾工商界有利、对台湾经济发展有利的举措，我们都愿意务实推动，积极促成。
（二）"三通"是两岸间的事，是两岸中国人内部的事务。两岸"三通"，已表明了它的性质和定位。两岸空中、海上通航，即是两岸航线。任何人企图把两岸"三通"说成或作为"国与国"的或"准国际"的"三通"，或将其变相"国际化"，都是我们坚决反对的。
（三）搁置政治争议，不因政治分歧影响和干扰两岸"三通"。两岸"三通"属于经济问题。两岸之间的政治分歧不应成为阻挠"三通"的借口和障碍。"三通"商谈不是政治谈判，在这种商谈中可以不涉及一个中国的政治含义，寻求务实地解决"三通"中的各种具体问题，推动"三通"进程。
（四）直接双向、互惠互利、平等协商。按此精神推动实现的"三通"，才是真正的"三通"，才能扩大两岸经济交流与合作领域，使之持久、健康发展，达到维护和发展两岸同胞共同利益的目的。
（五）由两岸民间行业组织协商"三通"问题。为早日实现"三通"，协商方式可以尽量灵活，解决办法应当简单易行，力求使技术问题单纯化、解决方式便捷化。在台湾当局造成海协与海基会对话、商谈无法恢复的形势下，可采取由两岸民间行业组织协商"三通"的办法。这一协商方式的步骤是：（1）民间协商。两岸民间行业组织就"三通"问题进行协商，双方有关业务主管部门人员可以民间名义参与商谈。（2）达成共识。长期以来，两岸民间行业组织已就如何解决"三通"的技术性、业务性问题累积了大量经验。在此基础上，经两岸民间行业组织正式协商，即可达成共识。（3）各自确认。经商谈达成的"共识"、"协议"、"纪要"、"备忘录"或"商务安排"，经由两岸有关方面各自确认后，即可组织实施。这种解决办法无损于双方的权利。
（六）台湾当局应当尽早取消针对大陆的各种歧视性限制和不合理障碍。台湾当局对"三通"采取的间接、单向、局部等限制性政策，破坏了两岸正常的贸易和投资秩序，损害了公平竞争的市场环境，侵害了大陆和台湾相关企业的合法权益。2003年9月，台湾当局单方面宣布"两岸航空货运便捷化"措施，提出台湾航空公司的货运飞机可经停港澳往来两岸。对此，大陆民航主管部门认为，两岸货运包机经停第三地是舍近求远，两岸通航应由两岸航空业者公平地参与经营，这样才能健康持续发展，两岸同胞和工商业者才能得到实惠。不经双方民间航运业者协商，单方面宣布两岸货运便捷化时限，是不妥当的，也是大陆方面不能接受的。10月，在广大台湾同胞和工商界进一步要求开放两岸直接"三通"下，台湾当局有关方面部分放宽了一些限制两岸人员往来、贸易、投资的规定，但同时又附加了一些新的限制条件，继续拖延开放两岸直航。我们希望台湾当局从两岸同胞的共同利益出发，在实现两岸直接、双向通航方面，切实采取有效措施，做些实事， 尽快取消对大陆的各种歧视性限制和不公平待遇。
四、两岸"三通"中若干问题的说明
（一）关于两岸民间行业组织协商"三通"问题。
"三通"问题，原本可以通过已经建立的两岸协商机制进行商谈，即由海协与海基会商谈。两会于1992年达成各自以口头方式表述"海峡两岸均坚持一个中国原则"的共识，建构了两会商谈的政治基础。台湾当局现任领导人上台后，矢口否认"九二共识"，破坏了两会商谈的基础，致使两会对话、商谈迄今无法恢复。在这种情况下，并考虑到两岸民间行业组织多年来建立了顺畅的沟通渠道，就"三通"技术性、业务性问题进行过深入探讨并达成了许多共识，因此我们主张，由两岸民间行业组织就"三通"问题进行协商。这是现阶段最为务实可行的协商方式。
（二）关于两岸直航中飞机、船舶的旗、证问题。
两岸空运、海运业界在多年的交流中已就两岸空中、海上直航中飞机、船舶的旗、证等问题，取得相当的共识，两岸空运、海运也有成功的实践，为解决这些问题提供了可供遵循的依据。
在空中通航方面。根据国际民用航空公约及附件的有关规定，航空器必须有国籍或地区籍标志和登记标志，该标志须从国际电信联盟分配给登记国或地区的无线临时呼叫信号中的国籍或地区籍代号系列中选择。目前，大陆和台湾的航空器标志均为英文字母"B"。因此，两岸直航的航空器已不存在标志问题。关于直航中涉及的主要证照的查验问题，可由负责运营的台湾地区航空公司向大陆民航主管部门出具所需证照的合格证明，经认可后，该航空公司即可提出申请。这一简单易行、务实灵活的做法，已在2003年春节台商包机业务实施过程得到运用和验证，为解决今后两岸双向直航中的相关问题提供了有益的经验。
在海上通航方面。两岸直航船舶的挂旗、验证问题，可以参照"九七"后港台航线和福建沿海地区与金门、马祖通航的相关办法解决，即：直航两岸的船舶，只挂公司旗或双方商定的标志旗，进港时不挂对方旗；双方须查验的有关证书，必要时可另纸签注。
（三）关于外国公司参与两岸航运的问题。
两岸通航不是"国与国之间的通航"，两岸航线不是国际航线，应由两岸的空运、海运公司或两岸合资的航运公司经营。在两岸注册的中外合资的空运、海运公司可以参与经营，但外资方面不得控股。我们的上述主张，既有利于确保中国航运主权不受侵犯的原则，又有利于维护两岸中国人的正当权益。
（四）关于实现"三通"与所谓"台湾安全"的问题。
台湾当局以两岸实现"三通"尤其是直接、双向通航将严重危及台湾的安全，作为阻挠两岸直接、双向、全面"三通"的最主要理由。最近台湾有关方面将安全问题分列为军事安全、政治安全（主要是台湾在政治上被矮化）、经济安全（主要是台湾经济对大陆市场依赖度大幅提升、产业空洞化、失业率上升）、社会安全（主要是治安、疫病防治、社会福利与教育负担等）。除了社会安全所针对的可能性问题，可以在"三通"问题协商中加以讨论、预作安排外，其余看法均缺乏事实依据，而是台湾当局顽固坚持敌对意识的产物，目的在于影响台湾同胞对"三通"的态度，继续拖延、阻挠"三通"。因此，有必要予以指正。
关于"直航将严重威胁台湾军事安全"。首先，就大陆对台政策而言，两岸同胞情同手足，血浓于水，没有人比我们更希望通过和平方式解决台湾问题。大陆方面以最大的诚意、尽最大努力争取和平统一的前景。我们不承诺放弃使用武力，针对的是外国势力干涉中国统一和台湾分裂势力的"台独"图谋，决不是针对台湾民众。其次，有关两岸海上和空中直航的技术性、业务性安排等问题，须经双方平等协商并取得一致意见后方能实施。台湾方面对自身安全的关切届时能得到妥善解决。第三，两岸试点直航已开通六年，福建沿海与金门、马祖海上直航也已开通两年多，从未出现过任何影响台湾"军事安全"的问题，也没有给台湾带来任何所谓的"威胁"。相反，这种直接往来有利于营造台海地区和谐安定的气氛。第四，实现和维护台湾海峡地区和平与稳定的根本途径在于，台湾当局必须彻底放弃"台独"分裂主张，停止一切"台独"分裂活动，并且就"在一个中国原则下，正式结束两岸敌对状态"进行谈判，达成协议，共同维护国家主权和领土完整，并对今后两岸关系发展进行规划。两岸敌对状态越降低，台海地区越祥和，两岸关系越发展，两岸同胞的安全越有保障。
关于在两岸"三通"协商过程中"台湾在政治上被矮化"。我们一贯主张，两岸之间应当本着相互尊重、平等协商的精神，以务实的态度解决双方的分歧和各种问题，任何一方都不将自己的意愿强加给另一方。以往海协与海基会的历次商谈，以及两岸民间行业组织之间的各种交流和磋商，双方都是平等的，不存在谁"矮化"谁的问题。在两岸试点直航及福建沿海与金门、马祖的海上通航中，双方间运力安排及技术问题的处理，均充分体现了平等互惠的原则，实现了互利双赢。今后协商"三通"问题，包括解决市场开放、相关管理、经营权益安排等，依然是遵循相互尊重、平等协商、公平合理、互惠互利的原则精神。根本不存在所谓台湾在"三通"过程中可能被"矮化"的问题。
关于"'三通'将冲击台湾经济安全"。其一，关于"三通"使台湾经济对大陆市场依赖度上升而产生安全问题。两岸经济各具优势，互补性强。在两岸经济交流与合作中，台湾经济从大陆经济迅速发展中获得了增长的动力，产业结构调整获得了有利条件，企业获得新的发展空间，促进了台湾经济的发展，近20年来的事实已经充分证明了这一点。在经济全球化和区域经济合作的大潮中，如果实现"三通"，两岸经济各展所长，密切合作，将更有利于两岸防范经济金融风险，实现共同繁荣。只要站在台湾同胞利益和经济发展需要的立场上来看问题，就会得出这种结论。
其二，关于"三通"加速台湾产业移往大陆、导致台湾产业"空洞化"问题。产业"空洞化"一般是指制造业在总体经济中的比重下降，以及制造业生产力及国际竞争力降低。台湾有关部门的研究表明，1990年至2001年间是台湾企业投资大陆增长较快的时期。在此期间，台湾产品在全球市场的出口占有率并未下降，反而由1.96%升至2.0%，并没有造成台湾制造业的总体生产力和竞争力的衰退，导致出现所谓产业"空洞化"现象。相反，两岸"三通"有利于台湾企业合理调配和使用生产要素及资源。通过分工合作，可以发挥台湾经济的优势，增强发展潜力和提高竞争力，有效避免产业"空洞化"。
其三，关于台湾企业对大陆投资导致岛内失业率上升问题。近几年台湾失业率上升主要是企业投资意愿下降所致。台湾当局现任领导人坚持"台独"分裂立场，破坏两岸关系，阻挠两岸"三通"，打击了台湾民间及海外投资者的信心，是其中的一个重要原因。同时，台湾失业率上升也有结构性失业的原因。随着台湾投资和生产成本的上升，台湾劳动密集型产业进一步失去竞争优势，不得不寻找低成本的地区继续发展。这类企业在大陆投资经营，不仅使其自身重获竞争力，而且能够利用在大陆投资的收益增强在台湾的投资能力，支持台湾新兴产业的持续成长，大幅带动了对大陆的出口。 这些都对扩大台湾就业、产业升级和经济稳定发挥了重要作用。
结 束 语
我们对实现两岸直接、双向、全面"三通"的前景充满信心。合则两利，通则双赢，早通比晚通好。我们呼吁台湾当局尽快采取实际措施，消除阻挠实现两岸直接、双向、全面"三通"的障碍。我们真诚地希望，广大台湾同胞与我们一道共同努力，争取尽早实现两岸直接、双向、全面"三通"，开创两岸关系的新局面。
English Edition：Actively and Realistically Promote "Three Direct Links" Across the Taiwan Straits by Reliance on the People and in the Interests of the People
Actively and Realistically Promote "Three Direct Links"
Across the Taiwan Straits by Reliance on the People
and in the Interests of the People
Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council
(December 17, 2003)
Foreword
Owing to the military confrontation across the Taiwan Straits in the past 30 years or more since 1949, people-to-people contacts and direct links in mail, transport and trade between the two sides of the Taiwan Straits were totally suspended, resulting in total division between the compatriots across the Straits. On New Year's Day 1979, the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress (NPC) of the People's Republic of China (PRC) issued a message to compatriots in Taiwan. In a bid to make it easier for family members, relatives and friends of compatriots on both sides of the Straits to visit each other, to communicate, travel, and develop economic, cultural and other ties, the message initiated a proposal for "starting postal and air and shipping services across the Straits as soon as possible," and "developing trade, supplying each other's needs, and conducting economic exchanges." The mainland has since spared no effort in forging direct links in mail, transport and trade (hereinafter referred to as the "three direct links," or "three links") across the Straits. In November 1987, the Taiwan authorities made the decision to permit Taiwan compatriots to visit their relatives on the mainland, which was welcomed by the mainland and ended the 38-year-long severance between the two sides of the Straits. People-to-people contacts and economic and cultural exchanges across the Straits have since made developed, and thus accelerated the progress of the "three direct links." Such contacts and exchanges have made much headway in the past dozen years. But, to our regret, the cross-Straits "three links" remains in an indirect, one-way and partial state due to restrictions and obstructions imposed by the Taiwan authorities. An early realization of direct, two-way and complete "three links" will be in the immediate and fundamental interests of people on both sides of the Straits. We hope that compatriots on both sides will make concerted efforts and actively and realistically promote the "three direct links" across the Straits, so as to bring benefits to our posterity.
I. The Status Quo of the "Three Direct Links" Across the Straits and the Problems to Be Solved
1. Progress of the "Three Direct Links"
Under strong demand from compatriots, and due to negotiations and efforts by business circles, on both sides of the Straits, the "three direct links" have started from scratch and progressed to varying degrees.
(1) Postal Link
Mail Service
The mainland formally launched ordinary and registered mail services with Taiwan in 1979. In 1989 inter-Straits direct postal parcel delivery was established via Hong Kong. In April 1993, the mainland-based Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Straits (ARATS) and the Taiwan-based Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF) signed the Agreement on Inquisition and Compensation of Registered Letters Across the Straits. Registered letter service hence went into formal operation across the Straits.
Telecommunication Service
In 1979, the mainland started telegraph and telephone services with Taiwan. In 1989, Taiwan opened telegraph and telephone services with the mainland via a third place. In 1996, China Telecom and the Taiwan-based Chunghwa Telecom set up direct telecom business ties. And direct telecommunication channels across the Straits were set up through Sino-American, Eurasian and Asia-Pacific seabed optical cables constructed in 1999 and 2000. The telecommunication departments of both sides have launched mutual telephone, data communication, mobile phone roaming and videophone services. Cross-Straits telecom business has been booming, accounting for the largest and second-largest shares of the overseas telecom business of Taiwan and the mainland, respectively.
(2) Transport Link
Shipping Service
In August 1979, the mainland proposed for negotiations on sea transportation across the Straits with the shipping community in Taiwan, and declared that Taiwan ships would have access to all its open ports. In order to ensure navigation security across the Straits, the mainland offered the services of mainland lighthouses to ships from Taiwan, and fully opened offshore radio service to Taiwan ships to provide them with communication and navigation services. In addition, the two sides co-founded a search and rescue hotline. Relevant regulations, such as Measures for Shipping Management Across the Taiwan Straits, promulgated in August 1996, standardize essential matters concerning direct shipping across the Straits. So far, seven business offices and 37 shipping agencies for Taiwan-based shipping companies have been given approval to be set up at key ports on the mainland's coastal areas.
In April 1997, direct shipping between Fuzhou and Xiamen, and Gaoxiong entered trial operation. Mainland- and Taiwan-invested shipping companies can use vessels with a flag of convenience to transport foreign transshipment trade cargos of both sides via Gaoxiong Port. In March 1998, a regular container shipping route was inaugurated across the Straits, whereby cargo ships calling at ports across the Straits require change of documents rather than vessels at a third place.
In consideration of the demand of the people in Jinmen and Mazu, in early 2001 the mainland provided every possible assistance for shipping between the two islands and the coastal areas of Fujian Province. Vessels funded by and registered on either side of the Straits can conduct passenger and cargo transport across the Straits by flying only company flags.
Air Service
In October 1981, the mainland's civil aviation administration expressed readiness to negotiate at any time with its Taiwan counterpart on an air link across the Straits. In March 1990, the mainland released the Provisional Regulations on Application and Approval Procedures for Nonscheduled Flights of Civil Aviation Transport Between the China Mainland and Taiwan. From 1989 to 1996, the civil aviation sectors of both sides each served as sales agencies in passenger and cargo transport for the other, and commenced one-ticket and through baggage services between them. They signed several agreements on cooperation in the aspects of ticket-booking, commerce, plane maintenance, aviation and services. In December 1995 and August 1996, Air Macao and Dragonair opened Macao-Taiwan and Hong Kong-Taiwan air routes, respectively, realizing indirect air links between the mainland and Taiwan via Macao and Hong Kong. Since 1997, four Taiwan airlines have been given approval to set up their representative offices in Beijing.
In 2003, the mainland adopted flexible and practical measures aimed at handling special cases with special methods, to facilitate Taiwan business people's return to the island for the Spring Festival: Six Taiwan airlines were given approval to operate charter planes 16 times to carry Taiwan business people to commute between Taibei and Gaoxiong and Shanghai via Hong Kong and Macao. This was the first time in 50-plus years that Taiwan-operated planes had landed at a mainland airport by a normal approach.
(3) Business Link (Trade, Investment and Finance)
Trade
Since 1979, the mainland has opened its market to Taiwan products, offering them preferential treatment such as tax exemption or reduction. In December 2000, the Ministry of Foreign Trade and Economic Cooperation of the PRC released Measures for the Administration of Trade with the Taiwan Area. The cross-Straits trade volume was a mere US $46 million-worth in 1978, but it shot up to US $44.66 billion-worth in 2002, approximately 971 times as much as the 1978 figure. By the end of September 2003, the accumulated volume of cross-Straits trade had totaled US $309.18 billion-worth, of which US $48.89 billion-worth came from mainland's exports to Taiwan, and US $260.29 billion-worth from Taiwan's imports, the mainland's trade deficit with Taiwan amounting to an accumulative total of US $211.4 billion. Since 1991 the mainland has become Taiwan's No.1 source of trade surplus. According to statistics, in 2002 the mainland had become the largest export market for Taiwan, and the island was the mainland's second-largest import market.
Investment
In July 1988, the State Council of the PRC issued the Regulations for Encouraging Investment by Taiwan Compatriots. In 1992 the Taiwan authorities permitted Taiwan compatriots to make indirect investment in, and carry out technical cooperation with, the mainland via a third place. In March 1994, the Standing Committee of the NPC adopted the Law on the Protection of Investment by Taiwan Compatriots. In December 1999, the State Council formulated the Detailed Rules for the Implementation of the Law on the Protection of Investment by Taiwan Compatriots, and local people's congresses and governments accordingly worked out corresponding local regulations and administrative rules in light of local conditions. A legal system was therefore formed or improved to protect the legal rights and interests of Taiwan compatriots in the mainland. Relevant departments and local governments in the mainland have made continuous efforts to improve investment environment and provide good service for Taiwan compatriots, thereby promoting their investments. By the end of September 2003, a total of 59,458 Taiwan-invested projects had been approved on the mainland, with the contractual value of Taiwan investment totaling US $67.98 billion, and the actually utilized Taiwan investment totaling US $35.71 billion. According to statistics from Taiwan, Taiwan business people have since 1993 taken the mainland as their first choice for outside-the-island investment.
Financial Exchanges and Cooperation
In 2002, mainland-based commercial banks officially started remittance and letter of credit business with the offshore bank units (OBU) of Taiwan-based banks. In 2003, they further opened this businesses with the domestic bank units (DBU) in Taiwan. By October 2003, the mainland had approved the establishment of 2 Taiwan-invested banks, representative offices of 7 Taiwan-based banks, 12 representative offices of 9 Taiwan-based insurance companies and 1 Taiwan-based insurance brokerage company, and 17 representative offices of 12 Taiwan-based securities companies.
In the process of promoting the "three direct links," nongovernmental trade organizations across the Straits have carried out in-depth discussions time and again on relevant technical and professional issues involved in the "three direct links," and reached consensus in many aspects. Negotiations on inter-Straits communication have been going on successfully. Trial direct navigation across the Straits is operating smoothly. Delicate issues concerning two-way direct shipping between coastal areas of Fujian Province and Jinmen and Mazu have been properly resolved. Meanwhile, Taiwan-operated charter planes for the first time transported Taiwan's businesspeople across the Straits during the 2003 Spring Festival. All these facts show that businesspeople on both sides can undoubtedly find methods acceptable to both sides. As a matter of fact, both the technical and professional issues involved in the "three direct links" have been settled.
2. The Current Indirect, Two-way and Partial State of the "Three Direct Links" Has Impeded the Exchanges and Contacts Between Compatriots and the Development of Economic and Trade Cooperation Across the Straits.
Mail
Cross-Straits postal parcels have to be delivered via Hong Kong or Macao. Postal business is of a limited scope, and parcel post, small parcel post, remittance and express delivery services still remain unopened.
Transport
Direct shipping and flight are still unavailable. Cross-Straits travelers therefore have to transit via a third place such as Macao or Hong Kong. Cross-Straits cargos are ineligible for trial direct shipping, and have to be transshipped via a third place such as Hong Kong or Japan. Here arises the curious phenomenon of "cross-Straits cargo ships bringing in no cargos and arriving cargos not being brought by cargo ships."
Trade
The mainland market has been completely opened to Taiwan enterprises and commodities, while the mainland's exported commodities are subject to many discriminatory restrictions in Taiwan. Many of the mainland's advantageous commodities that are in high demand in Taiwan can find no access to the island. Mainland enterprises are not allowed to invest in Taiwan, or to set up their necessary business agencies there. It is difficult for mainland enterprises to hold or attend economic and trade exhibitions and business talks in Taiwan. And the mainland's businesspeople face many restrictions on investigation tours of or visits to Taiwan.
3. The Failure to Realize Direct, Two-way and Complete "Three Links" Is Mainly Attributed to Obstruction by the Taiwan Authorities.
For a long time in the past, the Taiwan authorities have set up numerous barriers to inter-Straits "three direct links," in disregard of the eager desire of compatriots across the Straits and the demands of Taiwan's economic growth. Lee Teng-hui and the current leader of the Taiwan authorities have both tried to stall and obstruct the "three direct links" on the pretext of seeking "equality, security and dignity." The Taiwan authorities have willfully added stringent restrictive clauses to regulations concerning the "three direct links," attaching to them various political prerequisites in an attempt to hamper cross-Straits negotiation on the "three direct links." On the one hand, the current leader of the Taiwan authorities refuses to accept the one-China principle or acknowledge the "1992 common understanding." As a result, cross-Straits dialogue and negotiation cannot be resumed. On the other hand, he refuses to accept the simple and facile method of having nongovernmental trade organizations negotiate "three direct links" matters, causing protracted delay in the opening of the "three direct links" negotiation. Facts have spoken volumes that, although the current leader of the Taiwan authorities has indicated that the "three direct links" should not be a problem and is "an inevitable way to go," in essence he is unwilling at all to see the cross-Straits exchanges and the normal development of inter-Straits relations. He has broken his promise, gone back on his word, and done everything in his power to postpone the opening of the "three direct links." What's more, he has tried every possible means to politicize and complicate the "three direct links" issue, even to try to incorporate it in his framework of separatist proposition of "one country on each side." The stand and policies of the current leader of the Taiwan authorities aimed at disrupting the development of cross-Straits relations and splitting the motherland are the root cause of the failure so far to realize the direct, two-way and complete "three links."
II. Realization of the "Three Direct Links" Accords with the Immediate Interests of Compatriots Across the Straits, and Is the Fundamental Way to Attaining Mutual Benefit and a Win-Win Situation.
1. The Direct, Two-Way and Complete "Three Links" Is an Objective Demand for People-to-People Contacts and Economic and Trade Exchanges Across the Straits.
Between 1988 and 2002, more than 27 million Taiwan people visited their relatives and friends, traveled, conducted investment or engaged in other cross-Straits exchanges on the mainland, whereas well over 700,000 mainlanders visited Taiwan. In 2002 the cross-Straits volume of passenger transport approached four million, the trade volume exceeded US $40 billion-worth, and the volume of cargo transport reached anything up to tens of millions of tons. Failure to institute the direct, two-way and complete "three links" has not only increased the economic burden on compatriots across the Straits, particularly Taiwan compatriots, but also wasted much of their time and energy.
Passenger Transport
On a flight from Taibei to Shanghai via Hong Kong, a round-trip ticket only from Taiwan to Hong Kong will cost US $380. This means that 27 million people will spend a total of well over US $10 billion more than necessary. A direct flight from Taibei to Shanghai would take only one hour and 15 minutes, but when flying via Hong Kong as the stopover, the flight time will be extended to about four hours, not including waiting time in Hong Kong.
Freight Transport
The direct distance between Shanghai Harbor and Gaoxiong Harbor is 600 nautical miles, but sea transportation bypassing Japan's Ishigaki Island is 232 nautical miles longer, a voyage costing more money and taking more time than necessary. The adoption of a direct air transport service will definitely save time and reduce transport costs by wide margins, and cross-Straits trade will be increased as a result of improved efficiency of goods flow.
2. The Direct, Two-Way and Complete "Three Links" Will Help Boost Inter-Straits Economic Development.
Currently, economy on both sides of the Straits is in different stages of development. There are adequate conditions for mutual complementality and also much room for development in their economic cooperation. The history of cross-Straits economic exchange over the past dozen years is a "win-win" history of cross-Straits economic development.
Cross-Straits economic exchange and cooperation have contributed more than obviously to Taiwan's economic growth. According to the Taiwan-based Chung Hua Institution for Economic Research, every growth of US $1 in Taiwan's exports to the mainland will bring an increase of US $2 of direct or indirect output value to the relevant Taiwan industries. Taiwan's huge favorable trade balance with the mainland has contributed greatly to the growth of its foreign exchange reserve, and continuous cross-Straits trade development will be of vital importance to Taiwan's economic growth.
The attainment of the direct, two-way and complete "three links" will help ensure Taiwan's sustained economic growth. Since 1988, the shift of Taiwan's labor-intensive industries to the mainland has rejuvenated these industries. The obstruction of the "three direct links" has been one of the important causes of Taiwan's economic stagnation, slowed industrial structure upgrading, reduced investment, decreased consumption, increased unemployment rate and soaring index of people's plight over the past few years. Taiwan's industrial and commercial circles believe that realization of the "three direct links" will bring Taiwan's advantageous geographical location into full play, and greatly improve its investment environment; that Taiwan's enterprises can make full use of the mainland's resources and markets to further develop themselves, and promote Taiwan's economic development; that, in return, mainland enterprises can also make investments in Taiwan, which will undoubtedly inject new vitality into Taiwan's economy and create more business opportunities.
Cross-Straits economic exchange and cooperation have contributed significantly to the mainland's economic development as well. Taiwan investors have brought funds, technology, enterprise management know-how and marketing experiences to the mainland, helped expand its overseas trade and increased its tax revenue. Taiwan compatriots have more opportunities to participate in the mainland's march toward the magnificent goal of building a better-off society in an all-round way, and they themselves will achieve further development while helping to boost the mainland's economic development.
3. The Direct, Two-Way and Complete "Three Links" Will Help Compatriots on Both Sides of the Straits Jointly to Adapt to the Trends of Economic Globalization and Regionalization, Strengthen Cooperation, Seize Opportunities and Meet Challenges.
In the world today, science and technology are progressing by leaps and bounds, economic globalization and regionalization are gaining momentum, and competition in comprehensive strength is becoming increasingly acute. The people on both sides of the Straits are faced with both opportunities and challenges. The early achievement of the direct, two-way and complete "three links" will provide both sides of the Straits more sufficient information, more convenient transport, more smooth capital circulation, and more efficient resources allocation. In this way, each of the two sides will be properly placed and each will bring its own potential capacity to play, to the point of helping greatly to enhance the economic competitiveness of both sides, accelerate mutual development and boost the overall economic rejuvenation of the whole Chinese nation.
During the past decade or more, inter-Straits relations have undergone twists and turns, but cross-Straits people-to-people contacts and economic and cultural exchanges, have all along remained on the rise, opening up new prospects for the progress of the "three direct links." These fully demonstrate the congenial connections of the people on both sides of the Straits, their sharing the same language and national feeling and their having increasingly deep common interests. The "three direct links" will help toward common economic prosperity and accord with the fundamental and immediate interests of people on both sides of the Straits. Cross-Straits people-to-people contacts and economic and cultural exchanges have yielded abundant returns, which serve as both a solid foundation and an inner impetus for achieving the direct, two-way and complete "three links." People from all walks of life in Taiwan are ardently calling for the early realization of the "three direct links." Compatriots on both sides of the Straits have performed many successful deeds and gained a wealth of experience in the process of promoting the "three direct links," while, on its part, the mainland has made full preparations in all aspects for the attainment of the "three direct links." In a word, the "three direct links" is the trend of the times and the will of the people.
III. The Mainland's Basic Stand and Policies on the "Three Direct Links"
Both the mainland and Taiwan belong to one China. China is the common homeland of compatriots on both sides of the Straits. Any separatist attempt and action aimed at cooking up "Taiwan Independence," "two Chinas," and "one China, one Taiwan" will be opposed by people on both sides of the Straits. The "three direct links" accords with the common interests of the people across the Straits. It is the inevitable requirement of constantly expanding cross-Straits contacts and should not be hampered by any artificial or political factors. We hope to realize the "three direct links" at an early date and across the board, so as to open up a new situation for cross-Straits economic cooperation and benefit compatriots on both sides of the Straits. Proceeding from this basic stand, we wish to reaffirm our policies and propositions concerning the "three direct links."
1. Relying on the People and Working for the Wellbeing of the People's Are Our Stand and Purpose in the Resolution of the "Three Direct Links" Issue.
During the process of promoting the "three direct links," we will actively and pragmatically help promote the measures that will genuinely benefit the compatriots, people-to-people contacts, and the development of economic and trade relations between the two sides of the Straits, and, especially, benefit the Taiwan compatriots, and industrial and commercial circles and Taiwan's economic development as a whole.
2. The "Three Direct Links" Is a Cross-Straits Affair and an Internal Affair of Chinese People on Both Sides of the Straits.
The cross-Straits "three direct links" has itself manifested the nature of the issue as an internal affair of Chinese people. Cross-Straits direct air and shipping services are air and shipping routes across the Straits. We resolutely oppose anyone who attempts to describe "three direct links" as links "between nations" or as "quasi-international" links, or to "internationalize" them in disguised form.
3. Shelve Political Disputes and Prevent Political Differences from Affecting and Interfering with the "Three Direct Links"
The "Three direct links" is purely an economic matter. Political differences between the two sides of the Straits should not be used as a pretext or obstacle for obstructing the "three direct links." Negotiations concerning the "three direct links" are not political negotiations; they may be carried out beyond the political implications of one China, but should seek for practical resolution of the various concrete problems involved, so as to accelerate the progress of the "three direct links."
4. Direct and Two-Way Links, Reciprocity and Mutual Benefit, and Consultation on the Basis of Equality
The "three direct links" promoted and achieved in this spirit will be the "three direct links" in the true sense of the term, and only in this way can cross-Straits economic exchange and cooperation be expanded, and be developed in a sustained and healthy way, so as to attain the goal of safeguarding and improving the common interests of compatriots on both sides of the Straits.
5. Let Nongovernmental Trade Organizations on Both Sides of the Straits Conduct Consultation on the "Three Direct Links" Issue
To realize the "three direct links" as soon as possible, consultation may be conducted as flexibly as possible, the measures for resolution of the problem should be simple and feasible, technical problems should be to simplified, and the methods of resolving it easy and convenient. Given the situation caused by the Taiwan authorities, in which dialogues and consultation between the ARATS and SEF cannot be resumed, it may be feasible for nongovernmental trade organizations on both sides of the Straits to conduct such consultation on the "three direct links" issue. First, to hold consultation on a nongovernmental basis. Consultation may be conducted by such organizations on the issue, in which officials of relevant competent departments from both sides may participate in negotiations in the nongovernmental capacity. Second, to reach a consensus. Over the years, nongovernmental trade organizations on both sides have gained rich experience in how to solve technical and professional problems related to the "three direct links." Under these circumstances, formal consultation between these organizations can lead to a consensus. Third, to make respective confirmation. The "consensus," "agreement," "summary of minutes," "memorandum" or "business arrangement" attained after negotiations should be implemented upon confirmation by each side. This method of settlement will not bring any harm to either side, in terms of their rights.
6. The Taiwan Authorities Should Remove Discriminatory Restrictions and Unreasonable Obstacles Directed Against the Mainland As Soon As Possible.
The indirect, one-way and partial approach and other restrictive policies adopted by the Taiwan authorities on the "three direct links" issue have disrupted the normal order of cross-Straits trade and investment, damaged the market environment of fair competition, undermined the legal rights and interests of relevant mainland and Taiwan enterprises. In September 2003, the Taiwan authorities unilaterally declared "a simplified program for cross-Straits cargo air transport," in which, Hong Kong and Macao are designated as the stopovers for cross-Straits round trips by the air freighters of Taiwan airlines. The civil aviation administrative department on the mainland holds that chartered air freighters from either side of the Straits stopping over in a third place will amount to "rejecting what is near at hand and seeking for what is far away," and that cross-Straits air and shipping services should be equally operated by airlines from both sides, so as to maintain healthy and sustained development for such services and benefit compatriots and industrial and commercial circles across the Straits. Taiwan's simplified program for cross-Straits cargo flights, in which it unilaterally declared the time limitation of flights without consultation between nongovernmental air transport operators on both sides of the Straits, is inappropriate, and also unacceptable to the mainland. In October, at the further request of Taiwan compatriots and industrial and commercial circles for opening the "three direct links," the Taiwan authorities relaxed some restrictive regulations concerning cross-Straits people-to-people contacts, trade and investment, but at the same time setting some additional conditions, in order to continue to postpone the opening of cross-Straits direct air and shipping services. We hope that the Taiwan authorities will, starting from the common interests of compatriots on both sides of the Straits, take practical and effective measures for opening cross-Straits direct, two-way air and shipping services, and abolish discriminatory restrictions and unfair treatment against the mainland at an early date.
IV. Explanations on Some Questions Related to the "Three Direct Links"
1. Consultation on the "Three Direct Links" Question Between Cross-Straits Nongovernmental Trade Organizations
The "three direct links" question could have been discussed through the existing cross-Straits consultative mechanisms, namely the ARATS and the SEF. In 1992, the two organizations reached the common understanding that each should express verbally that "both sides of the Taiwan Straits adhere to the one-China principle," thus laying the political foundation for consultation between the ARATS and SEF. However, after coming to power the present leader of the Taiwan authorities categorically negated the "1992 common understanding," thus undermining the foundation for consultation between the two organizations, rendering it impossible yet for them to resume their dialogue and consultation. In these circumstances and considering that nongovernmental trade organizations across the Straits have already established smooth communication channels over the years, these organizations have conducted in-depth discussions on technical and professional questions related to the "three direct links," and have reached consensus in many aspects. Therefore, we propose that cross-Straits nongovernmental trade organizations conduct consultation on the "three direct links" issue. This is the most practical and feasible pattern of consultation at the present stage.
2. The Flag and Certificate in Cross-Straits Direct Air and Shipping Services
The air and maritime transport circles on both sides of the Straits have reached some understanding through many years of exchange of opinions on how to deal with aircraft and ship flag and certification paper problems in cross-Straits direct air and shipping services. This, plus the successful practices in cross-Straits air and maritime transport, has provided a referential basis for the solutions of these problems.
Air Service
According to relevant provisions in the International Convention on Civil Aviation and its appendixes, an aircraft must have the national or regional identity symbol and registration symbol, both of which must be selected from among the national or regional identity codes of their temporary wireless call signs given to the registering nation or region by the International Telecommunications Union. The aircraft symbols of both the mainland and Taiwan are the same English letter, B, thus the aircraft symbol question will not arise in direct air transport across the Straits. For main-certificate check and approval involved in direct air transport, a Taiwan-based airline company in charge of the operation may present a qualified certification paper for the necessary certificate to the mainland's civil aviation administrative department, and, upon approval, it may file its application. This simple, practical and flexible procedure was applied and verified in handling Taiwan businesspeople's charter plane business at the 2003 Spring Festival, providing useful experience for resolving problems to be involved in the two-way direct air transport across the Straits.
Shipping Service
The ships' flag and certification problems in cross-Straits direct shipping service can be resolved with reference to the relevant procedure adopted for the navigation lines for shipping service between Hong Kong and Taiwan after the reunion of Hong Kong with the motherland in 1997, as well as for the shipping service between Fujian's coastal areas and Jinmen and Mazu. That is to say that a ship of either side navigating directly across the Straits will need only to fly the company's flag or a flag with symbols agreed upon by the two sides, and, when entering a port of the other side, it will not need to fly the flag of the other side; and that one side should check the relevant certification papers of the other side and, if necessary, may write its comments on a separate paper.
3. Participation of Foreign Companies in Cross-Straits Air and Shipping Services
The air and shipping services across the Straits are by no means "state to state air and shipping services," nor are Cross-Straits air and shipping international lines, therefore they should be operated by mainland and Taiwan airlines and shipping companies or by mainland-Taiwan joint ventures. Sino-foreign joint airlines and shipping companies registered with the authorities on either side may participate in such business operations, but the foreign partners of such companies are not allowed to have the dominant share. These propositions of ours are conducive not only to safeguarding the principle of preventing China's sovereignty over aviation and navigation from being infringed upon, but also to protecting the legitimate rights and interests of the Chinese people on both sides of the Straits.
4. The "Three Direct Links" and the So-called Taiwan Security
The Taiwan authorities assert that the "three direct links," especially the direct, two-way air and shipping services across the Straits will seriously jeopardize the security of Taiwan, and take this assertion as their main reason for impeding the direct, two-way and complete "three links." Certain Taiwan organizations recently classified its security issue into the four issues of military security, political security (mainly, Taiwan's being dwarfed politically), economic security (mainly, Taiwan's markedly increasing economic dependence on the mainland market, its industrial "hollowing" and its growing unemployment rate), and social security (mainly, public order, epidemic prevention, social welfare and education burden). Apart from those possible problems relating to social security that can be discussed and pre-arranged in the "three direct links" consultations, the other viewpoints are ungrounded in facts; rather they are products of the Taiwan authorities' inveterate hostility toward the mainland, their purpose being to influence Taiwan compatriots' attitude toward the "three direct links" and continue to postpone and obstruct the "three direct links." These viewpoints need to be pointed out and corrected.
The Assertion That "Direct Air and Shipping Services Will Seriously Jeopardize Taiwan's Military Security." First, according to the mainland's policy on the Taiwan, the people on both sides of the Straits are bound together like brothers and sisters, and, as the saying goes, "Blood is thicker than water." We cherish greater hope than any others for s